Math // Algebra // Lab

Solving Linear Equations

Topic // Balance 3x + 5 = 20

What this topic is

Use algebraic methods to solve linear equations in one variable, including equations that require rearrangement, expanding brackets, and collecting terms on both sides; solve equations with rational number coefficients

Ages
11 to 14
Type
Method
Builds on
4 topics
Leads to
6 topics
Standards
7 codes

Quick check

If the learner is given an equation like 3x + 7 = 22, can they work through the steps to find the value of x?

Ask this to see whether the topic is secure.

Topic // Mastery

What mastery looks like

What a learner can do once this topic is secure.
  • Solve one-step and two-step linear equations in one variable
  • Solve equations requiring expansion of brackets and collection of like terms
  • Solve equations with the unknown on both sides and with fractional or negative coefficients

Topic // Map

Where this fits

What to learn first and what this topic opens up, with the reason for each link. Required links come first.
  • RequiredMust come first
  • HelpfulHelps, but not essential

Before this

4 topics
  • Algebra // Ages 10 to 11

    Solving linear equations extends KS2 missing-number problem work

  • Algebra // Ages 11 to 12

    Solving equations requires substitution skill to check answers

  • Multiplication & Division // Ages 11 to 12

    Solving linear equations by rearrangement requires applying inverse operations to isolate an unknown

  • Algebra // Ages 11 to 13

    Many equations require expanding brackets before solving

You are here

Solving Linear Equations

Ages 11 to 14 // Method

Leads to

6 topics
  • Algebra // Ages 11 to 13

    Modelling with algebra requires setting up and solving equations

  • Algebra // Ages 11 to 14

    Solving inequalities uses the same inverse-operation methods as solving equations

  • Algebra // Ages 12 to 14

    Rearranging formulae uses the same inverse-operation techniques as solving equations

  • Algebra // Ages 13 to 14

    Understanding simultaneous equations requires fluency with single linear equations

  • Algebra // Ages 12 to 14

    Testing whether a number is in a sequence requires solving a linear equation

  • Ohm's lawHelpful

    Electronics // Circuits // Ages 12 to 15

    Rearranging V = I × R is solving a one-step equation

Topic // Research-informed

Teaching notes

From the Marble Skill Taxonomy. These notes have not been validated in classrooms, so treat them as a starting point for your own judgement.

The approach

Solving a linear equation means finding the value of the unknown that makes both sides genuinely equal, by doing the SAME operation to both sides until the unknown is isolated. The relational meaning of '=' is the foundation: each written line must itself be a true equality, not a running commentary strung together with '='. Target the persistent errors — treating subtraction as commutative, refusing negative solutions, mishandling the unknown on both sides, and operating on one side only — with a balance model, inverse operations, explicit handling of negatives, and a substitution check back into the original equation.

Common misconceptions

  • Treats subtraction as commutative: 5−x=6 solved as x−5=6 giving x=11.
  • Considers positive numbers only, so rejects or never reaches a negative solution.
  • Run-on / operational equals sign: writes 5−x=6=x=−1 or 3x−5=2x=x=5, using '=' to mean 'and then'.
  • Mishandles the unknown on both sides (8x−6=2x): stops at 'unlike terms' or subtracts incorrectly.
  • Performs an operation on one side only, unbalancing the equation.
  • Thinks every equation has exactly one solution (misses none/infinitely-many).

Useful representations

  • Balance scale (unknown-boxes and unit-weights; same action on both pans)
  • Algebra tiles with zero-pairs for negatives and unknown-on-both-sides
  • Inverse-operation / function-machine unwinding
  • Number line for negative solutions
  • Substitution-back check

Teaching practices

  • Teach 'do the same to both sides' with a balance model so operations that keep the scale level are felt as legal and one-sided moves as illegal.
  • Insist on ONE valid equality per line — forbid run-on chains like 5−x=6=x=−1; each line must itself be true.
  • Isolate the unknown with inverse operations; for the unknown on both sides, gather it on one side by subtracting the smaller term from both.
  • Always check by substituting the solution back into the ORIGINAL equation.
  • Handle negatives explicitly (number line / zero-pairs) rather than assuming the answer must be positive; discuss whether an equation has one, none, or infinitely many solutions.

Activities to try

  1. 1

    Balance-scale solver: keep both pans level

    Why it works: The only way to keep the scale level while stripping it down to a single x is to mirror every move on both sides — that mirroring IS the solving method, and a negative result is a legitimate, visible outcome.

    1. Represent an equation as two pans: unknown-boxes (x) and unit-weights, using 'anti-weights' (zero-pairs) for any negative amount. Set up 8x − 6 = 2x with the −6 shown as six anti-weights on that pan.
    2. Choose an action (add or remove the same number of units, using zero-pairs where a pan has none to remove; remove an x-box; halve everything) and apply it to BOTH pans at once; watch the scale stay level.
    3. Try a one-sided action on purpose and observe that the scale tips — that move is not allowed because it breaks the equality.
    4. Solve 8x − 6 = 2x: remove 2 x-boxes from each pan to reach 6x − 6 = 0, then add 6 units to each pan (cancelling the six anti-weights) to reach 6x = 6, then divide both pans into 6 equal groups (÷6) to reach x = 1.
    5. Use an anti-x-box for −x, plus unit zero-pairs, to model 5 − x = 6: remove 5 units from both pans to reach −x = 1, then swap every item on both pans for its opposite (multiply both sides by −1) to reach x = −1, so the negative solution is something you build and see rather than distrust.
  2. 2

    One true equality per line: fix the run-on equals sign

    Why it works: '=' means the two sides have equal value, not 'and then'. Every line of correct working must be a standalone true statement.

    1. Read aloud, left to right, the chain 5 − x = 6 = x = −1. Decide whether each '=' states a genuine equality (does 6 really equal x?).
    2. Rewrite the working as a vertical chain where every single line is itself true: 5 − x = 6, then −x = 1, then x = −1.
    3. Do the same for 3x − 5 = 2x: rewrite the run-on 3x − 5 = 2x = x = 5 as separate true lines, subtracting 2x from both sides first (3x − 5 = 2x → x − 5 = 0 → x = 5), and check by substitution.
    4. Spot the invalid line: given a worked solution containing a run-on chain, identify which '=' is false and correct it.
  3. 3

    Solve, then check by substitution; classify how many solutions

    Why it works: A solved equation must survive a substitution check in the original; and not every equation has exactly one solution — some have none and some have infinitely many.

    1. Solve a set of equations by inverse operations, writing one true equality per line: start with 5 − x = 6 and 8x − 6 = 2x, then extend to equations with brackets and fractional/negative coefficients.
    2. For each solution, substitute it back into the ORIGINAL equation and confirm both sides are equal.
    3. Solve 2(x + 3) = 2x + 6 and decide what happens: after expanding the bracket, both sides are identical (2x + 6 = 2x + 6), so every value of x works — infinitely many solutions.
    4. Construct or examine an equation that simplifies to a false statement (e.g. a contradiction) and recognise it has no solution.
    5. Sort equations into 'one solution', 'no solution', 'infinitely many solutions'.

Topic // Standards

Curriculum standards

Codes for the curriculum statements this topic maps to. Each publisher owns its standard text.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics
6.EE.56.EE.77.EE.47.EE.4a8.EE.7a8.EE.7b
The national curriculum in England: Key stages 1 and 2 framework document
KS3.Maths.Alg.7

Math // Algebra