Science // Matter & Materials
Advanced Material Properties
Compare and group everyday materials based on advanced properties: hardness, solubility, transparency, electrical and thermal conductivity, and response to magnets
Quick check
Can the learner test materials and sort them by whether they dissolve in water, conduct electricity, or are attracted to a magnet?
Ask this to see whether the topic is secure.
Topic // Mastery
What mastery looks like
- Define and test for at least four properties: hardness, solubility, conductivity, magnetism
- Group a set of materials based on test results for each property
- Use results to explain why certain materials are chosen for specific uses (e.g. copper for wires because it conducts electricity)
Topic // Map
Where this fits
- RequiredMust come first
- HelpfulHelps, but not essential
Before this
4 topics- Choosing the Right MaterialRequired
Matter & Materials // Ages 6 to 8
Must understand material suitability before testing advanced properties like conductivity and solubility
- Material Properties VocabularyRequired
Matter & Materials // Ages 9 to 11
Grouping materials by hardness, solubility, transparency, conductivity, and magnetic response requires all these property terms
- Testing Materials for UsesHelpful
Matter & Materials // Ages 7 to 10
Within GB sequence, testing advanced properties supports justifying material choices; US teaches material uses earlier without this prerequisite
- Solids, Liquids & GasesHelpful
Matter & Materials // Ages 8 to 9
Understanding states of matter supports testing properties like solubility
You are here
Advanced Material Properties
Ages 9 to 11 // Concept
Leads to
1 topic- Dissolving & SolutionsRequired
Matter & Materials // Ages 9 to 10
Must understand solubility as a property before learning dissolving and recovery in detail
Topic // Research-informed
Teaching notes
From the Marble Skill Taxonomy. These notes have not been validated in classrooms, so treat them as a starting point for your own judgement.
The approach
Children aged 9–11 learn advanced material properties (hardness, solubility, transparency, electrical and thermal conductivity, response to magnets) by running fair comparative tests, recording measured results in a table, and using that evidence to justify which material best suits a given job. The central aim is evidence-based reasoning: the measured property — not the object's name or tradition — decides the use. Electrical and thermal conductivity are kept as separate tested properties because children commonly fuse them.
Common misconceptions
- A material that conducts electricity is assumed to conduct heat identically (electrical and thermal conductivity fused).
- 'Hardness' is confused with strength or with being heavy.
- A dissolved solid is thought to be destroyed rather than still present in solution.
- 'All metals are magnetic' — overgeneralising magnetism to non-ferrous metals like aluminium and copper.
- A material's use is attributed to the object's name/tradition rather than to a measured property.
Useful representations
- A multi-station property test bench (circuit, heat-travel, scratch-hardness, dissolve tank, magnet, light box)
- A properties results table with materials as rows and tested properties as columns
- A conductivity indicator (bulb brightness / reading) and a heat-travel colour gradient over time
- A 'pick the material for the job' brief that forces evidence-based selection
Teaching practices
- Have children RUN each property test and record a measured result in a shared table, rather than being told the outcome.
- Enforce fair/comparative testing: same quantity and conditions, one variable changed, so a result can be trusted.
- Close the loop from evidence to use — require pupils to justify a material choice by citing their own table.
- Treat electrical and thermal conductivity as separate measured columns to prevent the common fusion.
- Bring the test that best discriminates materials to the front (conductivity, hardness) and keep quantities identical across specimens.
Activities to try
- 1
Materials test lab: run the tests, fill the table
Why it works: Each property can be measured by an isolated fair test, and materials can be grouped and compared from the recorded evidence rather than from assumptions about what a material 'should' do.
- Set up a specimen rack with tiles of different materials (e.g. copper, iron, aluminium, glass, wood, plastic, rubber, chalk).
- At a circuit station, use a low-voltage battery circuit. Clip each tile into a gap in the circuit and observe whether the bulb lights (an optional conductivity reading makes this more concrete). Record conductor/insulator plus any measured value. Note that a simple bulb circuit usually cannot show differences between metals, because all the metal tiles light the bulb about equally.
- At a heat station, stand one end of each tile (or same-sized strips) in the same amount of hot (not boiling) water, never in a flame, because wood, plastic and rubber can burn, melt or give off fumes. Time or watch how fast heat travels to the other end, for example with a heat-sensitive strip or a small blob of butter or wax at the far end. An optional colour-gradient-over-time display or timer can make heat travel visible. Record how fast heat moves.
- At a scratch-hardness station, try scratching each material against the others to rank relative hardness; record the scratch order.
- At a dissolve station, use small granular or powdered samples rather than the tiles. Include some soluble solids (e.g. salt, sugar) alongside insoluble ones (e.g. sand, powdered chalk). Stir the same measured amount of each into the same fixed amount of water at the same temperature, and record whether it dissolves (soluble/insoluble).
- 2
Pick the material for the job
Why it works: The right material depends on which measured property the job needs; evidence from your own table, not the object's name or tradition, justifies the choice.
- Take a specific brief, e.g. 'choose the best handle for a hot pan' or 'choose the best core for an electromagnet'.
- Sort or scan the completed properties table to find which materials score best on the property the job actually needs.
- Notice when a material does well in one column but fails another. For example, copper conducts electricity well, yet a metal handle fails the heat-safety requirement because it conducts heat too well.
- State a choice and justify it by citing the specific measured property from the table (e.g. 'plastic for the handle because it is an insulator and heat travelled slowly through it in our test', 'copper for the wire because it conducted electricity in our test').
- Compare two metals for the same job (e.g. copper vs iron for a wire) and explain what the recorded results show. If the simple circuit showed no difference between them, say so, and note that other properties (e.g. bendiness, rusting) or measured conductivity readings would be needed to decide.
- 3
Predict-then-test the magnet (not all metals are magnetic)
Why it works: Being attracted to a magnet is a property of only some metals (mainly iron, most steels, nickel and cobalt), not a defining feature of all metals; a quick fair test settles it.
- Lay out an aluminium drinks can, a piece of solid copper (e.g. copper wire or pipe), a steel paperclip and a brass key. Avoid 'copper' coins: many, such as UK 1p and 2p coins made since 1992, are copper-plated steel and are attracted to magnets.
- Before testing, predict which the magnet will pick up and write down WHY.
- Test each one with the magnet and record what actually happens. If the objects really are aluminium, solid copper and solid brass, only the steel paperclip will be attracted.
- Compare the prediction with the result and, if 'all metals are magnetic' was assumed, correct it: name the common magnetic metals (iron, most steels, nickel, cobalt) and the non-magnetic ones just tested (aluminium, copper, brass).
- Answer a follow-up: name a metal a magnet will NOT pick up.
Topic // Standards
Curriculum standards
- Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) K-5
- 5-PS1-3
- The national curriculum in England: Key stages 1 and 2 framework document
- Y5.Sci.PCM.1
Science // Matter & Materials
More in Matter & Materials
- Irreversible ChangesAges 9 to 11ConceptExplain that some changes result in the formation of new materials and are not usually reversible, such as burning, rusting, and reactions with acid
- Conservation of MassAges 10 to 11ConceptMeasure and provide evidence that the total weight of matter is conserved regardless of the type of change (heating, cooling, or mixing)
- Reversible ChangesAges 9 to 10ConceptDemonstrate that dissolving, mixing, and changes of state are reversible changes where no new materials are formed
- Matter Is Made of ParticlesAges 10 to 11ConceptDevelop a model to describe that matter is made of particles too small to be seen, and that this explains properties of solids, liquids, and gases
- Separating MixturesAges 9 to 10MethodUse knowledge of solids, liquids, and gases to decide how mixtures might be separated through filtering, sieving, and evaporating
- Drawing Particle DiagramsAges 7 to 11RepresentationDraw and interpret particle diagrams — dot representations showing the arrangement, spacing, and movement of particles in solids (close, regular, vibrating in…
- Evaporation & the Water CycleAges 8 to 9ConceptIdentify the role of evaporation and condensation in the water cycle, and associate the rate of evaporation with temperature
- The Particle ModelAges 11 to 12ConceptUse the particle model to explain the properties of solids, liquids, and gases — including differences in arrangement, movement, and spacing — and apply the…