History // Historical Thinking
Checking Sources Against Each Other
Corroborate: check whether multiple sources agree on the same facts — and investigate why they might not
Quick check
If the learner was trying to find out what really happened in a historical event, would they know to look at more than one source and compare what they say?
Ask this to see whether the topic is secure.
Topic // Mastery
What mastery looks like
- Wineburg corroboration heuristic
- Historical Thinking in the Elementary Years (ERIC)
Topic // Map
Where this fits
- RequiredMust come first
- HelpfulHelps, but not essential
Before this
5 topics- Vocabulary: historical thinkingRequired
Historical Thinking // Ages 6 to 10
Corroborating sources requires the term 'corroborate' and 'evidence'
- Questioning Historical SourcesRequired
Historical Thinking // Ages 8 to 10
Corroborating across sources requires first knowing how to evaluate each source individually through sourcing
Historical Thinking // Ages 6 to 8
Corroboration builds directly on the understanding that accounts can differ — it is the systematic practice of comparing those differences
- Describing Rules & PatternsHelpful
Learning to Learn // Learning to Learn // Ages 8 to 9
Corroboration involves forming a generalisation from multiple instances of evidence — the universal generalisation habit applied to historical sources
- Evidence-Based WritingHelpful
English // Writing Composition // Ages 9 to 11
Corroborating information across multiple historical sources requires the skill of drawing and evaluating evidence from informational texts, as taught in English
You are here
Checking Sources Against Each Other
Ages 8 to 10 // Thinking skill
Leads to
3 topics- Evidence Versus InterpretationRequired
Historical Thinking // Ages 10 to 11
Understanding that the same evidence supports different interpretations requires first having practised comparing sources through corroboration
Ancient Egypt // Ages 11 to 13
Evaluating how knowledge of ancient Egypt is built from multiple source types, and why the same artefact can be interpreted differently, is corroboration in a domain-specific context
Ancient Egypt // Ages 12 to 14
Comparing archaeological evidence from worker villages against popular myths requires corroborating across multiple source types
History // Historical Thinking
More in Historical Thinking
- Understanding People in Their Own TimeAges 8 to 10Thinking skillUnderstand that people in the past saw the world very differently from us — judge their actions by the context they lived in, not only by today's values
- Evidence from the PastAges 6 to 7Thinking skillUnderstand that everything we know about the past comes from evidence — objects, buildings, pictures, documents, and stories that have survived