Math // Multiplication & Division

Order of operations

Understand and apply the conventional order of operations (PEMDAS/BODMAS) to carry out calculations involving the four operations

Ages
10 to 11
Type
Concept
Builds on
1 topic
Leads to
5 topics
Standards
1 code

Quick check

If the learner sees '8 + 4 × 3', do they get 20 — not 36 — because they know to do the multiplication before the addition?

Ask this to see whether the topic is secure.

Topic // Mastery

What mastery looks like

What a learner can do once this topic is secure.
  • Explain why 8 + 2 × 5 = 18 (not 50) by referencing multiplication before addition
  • Evaluate a multi-step expression like 12 ÷ 3 + 4 × 2 correctly as 12
  • State the correct order: brackets, then orders/exponents, then multiplication/division (L→R), then addition/subtraction (L→R)

Topic // Map

Where this fits

What to learn first and what this topic opens up, with the reason for each link. Required links come first.
  • RequiredMust come first
  • HelpfulHelps, but not essential

Before this

1 topic
  • Multiplication & Division // Ages 10 to 11

    The full BODMAS/PEMDAS convention extends understanding of grouping symbols to all operations

You are here

Order of operations

Ages 10 to 11 // Concept

Leads to

5 topics
  • Algebra // Ages 10 to 11

    Substituting into formulae requires understanding order of operations

  • Multiplication & Division // Ages 11 to 12

    Understanding order of operations (BODMAS) is required before studying how operations undo each other via inverse relationships

  • Multiplication & Division // Ages 11 to 12

    Order of operations with powers/roots extends Y6 BODMAS understanding

  • Algebra // Ages 10 to 11

    Solving equations uses order-of-operations understanding

  • Multiplication & Division // Ages 10 to 11

    Choosing operations benefits from order-of-operations understanding

Topic // Research-informed

Teaching notes

From the Marble Skill Taxonomy. These notes have not been validated in classrooms, so treat them as a starting point for your own judgement.

The approach

For ages 10–11, learners understand and apply the conventional order of operations (BODMAS/PEMDAS) across the four operations so that a multi-operation string has one agreed value. The core insight is structural: brackets sit at the top, then orders/exponents, then multiplication and division as one equal-rank tier swept left→right, then addition and subtraction as one equal-rank tier swept left→right. It is a social convention for removing ambiguity, not a law of nature, and brackets exist to override it. Activities build and check the sequencing skill, pre-empt the dominant 'do all × before any ÷' error, and surface why the convention is needed.

Common misconceptions

  • Strict left-to-right computation ignoring precedence: reading 8 + 2 × 5 as 50 because they add first.
  • Treating the acronym literally: doing Division before Multiplication (or Addition before Subtraction) because D/A come first in BODMAS, e.g. 12 ÷ 2 × 3 wrongly done as 12 ÷ 6 = 2.
  • Believing multiplication ALWAYS beats division rather than sharing a tier resolved left→right.
  • Ignoring or mis-scoping brackets — evaluating outside a bracket first, or dropping the bracket once opened.
  • Thinking the convention is a deep mathematical truth rather than an agreed notation choice, which blocks understanding of why brackets can override it.

Useful representations

  • A tiered 'staircase' or ladder diagram: Brackets on the top step, Orders next, ×÷ on one shared step, +− on the bottom shared step — visually encoding that same-step operations are equal and read left→right.
  • Colour-coded expression annotation (circle brackets, underline ×÷, box +−) applied to the live expression before evaluation.
  • Step-by-step rewrite chains where the expression shrinks one line at a time (12 ÷ 3 + 4 × 2 → 4 + 8 → 12), each line showing exactly one tier resolved.
  • Number line / equal-groups callback for WHY 8 + 2 × 5 = 18: the 2 × 5 is one chunk of ten added to 8, not (8+2) copied five times.

Teaching practices

  • Motivate the NEED first: give the class 8 + 2 × 5 and collect the different answers (18 and 50) before naming the rule — the convention exists precisely to end that disagreement, so let them feel the ambiguity.
  • Teach ×÷ as one equal-rank tier and +− as one equal-rank tier, always swept left→right, to pre-empt the dominant 'do all × before any ÷' error; use worked pairs like 12 ÷ 2 × 3 (=18, not 2) that break if you reorder within the tier.
  • Underline operations tier-by-tier in colour before computing — first circle brackets, then underline the ×÷ tier, then the +− tier — so the child sees the STRUCTURE of the expression before touching a single number.
  • Connect to already-secured brackets work (mt_8jFSnXxqQD): brackets are the top of the hierarchy and are the tool for overriding default precedence, so writing 8 + 2 then ×5 as (8 + 2) × 5 makes the intended order explicit.
  • Avoid over-reliance on the mnemonic: BODMAS/PEMDAS wrongly suggests D before M and A before S. Reinforce the two equal-rank tiers explicitly and rehearse counterexamples so the acronym doesn't cement the misconception.

Activities to try

  1. 1

    Two paths, two answers: feeling why we need a rule

    Why it works: The order of operations is an agreed convention that removes genuine ambiguity: the same symbols can yield different values unless everyone resolves them the same way, with multiplication/division taken before addition/subtraction.

    1. Meet a live multi-operation string such as 8 + 2 × 5 and decide which operation to resolve next by selecting it.
    2. Follow the path when you choose '+' first: watch 8 + 2 become 10, then × 5 become 50.
    3. Place a second copy of the same string beside it and resolve it the agreed way: 2 × 5 = 10 first, then + 8 = 18.
    4. Compare the two: identical symbols, two different answers — then state in your own words why an agreed order is needed.
    5. Try other ambiguous strings and predict both the 'reading-order' answer and the conventional answer before resolving.
  2. 2

    Same tier, left to right

    Why it works: Multiplication and division share one equal-rank tier and are resolved left→right (not all × before all ÷); addition and subtraction likewise share one tier resolved left→right.

    1. Evaluate 12 ÷ 2 × 3 by sweeping left→right within the ×÷ tier: 12 ÷ 2 = 6, then 6 × 3 = 18.
    2. Try resolving it the wrong way (× before ÷: 2 × 3 = 6, then 12 ÷ 6 = 2) and compare the two answers.
    3. Do the same for 10 − 4 + 2 within the +− tier: 10 − 4 = 6, then 6 + 2 = 8, and show why doing 4 + 2 first gives the wrong answer.
    4. Evaluate 12 ÷ 3 + 4 × 2: resolve both multiplications/divisions in reading order, then add, reaching 4 + 8 = 12.
  3. 3

    See the structure before you compute

    Why it works: Reading the structure of an expression tier-by-tier before touching numbers makes the correct sequence clear and keeps multi-tier, bracketed strings manageable.

    1. Before calculating, annotate the expression by tier: circle brackets, underline the ×÷ operations, box the +− operations.
    2. Build a rewrite chain that shrinks one line at a time, each line resolving exactly one tier, e.g. 12 ÷ 3 + 4 × 2 → 4 + 8 → 12.
    3. For 3 × (4 + 2) − 10 ÷ 5, resolve the bracket first (4 + 2 = 6), then the ×÷ tier (3 × 6 = 18 and 10 ÷ 5 = 2), then the +− tier (18 − 2 = 16), justifying each step.
    4. Explain the resolution of each line aloud so the order is stated, not just performed.

Topic // Standards

Curriculum standards

Codes for the curriculum statements this topic maps to. Each publisher owns its standard text.
The national curriculum in England: Key stages 1 and 2 framework document
Ma6/2.2f

Math // Multiplication & Division